Read our new research-based guide to pupil motivation and engagement

Mythbusting the early career framework

Share this page

Date published 20 April 2021

Unpacking the development programme for early career teachers.

In our first article explaining what the early career framework (ECF) is, we called it “one of the most significant reforms to the teaching profession in a generation”. This is certainly the case. The framework is a robust evidence base for best practice that will shape teacher development for years to come. It is therefore very important for school leaders and teachers to fully understand the benefits of the framework.

Here we bust five myths about the Early Career Framework:

1. It's not just another assessment framework.

2. ECF will not cost schools extra money.

3. Mentoring is different under the ECF framework.

4. Different providers do not offer different hours in which to complete the ECF.

5. ECF does not mean more Ofsted inspections.

1. It’s not just another assessment framework.

While the early career framework references the Teachers’ Standards, the DfE is clear when it states: “the ECF is not and should not be used as an assessment tool.”

Early career teachers or their mentors will not be expected to collect evidence against the early career framework and they will continue to be assessed against the Teachers’ Standards only. The framework underpins an entitlement to training and development-focussed support for early career teachers, and may support the monitoring of progress, but is not an assessment framework.

The DfE has issued guidance for schools outlining that: “two formal assessments points should take place during induction: one midway through induction, and one at the end of the induction period. These should be supported by regular reviews to monitor progress, to take place in each term where a formal assessment does not.”

This is helpful for teachers, mentors and school leaders alike because it makes it clear that, while early career teachers must meet Teachers’ Standards, the emphasis of the early career framework is on supporting and developing teachers at this stage of their careers.

2. ECF will not cost schools extra money.

The DfE has said that “all state-funded schools offering statutory induction will receive additional funding to deliver the early career framework reforms.” This will fund:

  • 5% additional time in the early career teacher’s second year to undertake induction activities including training and mentoring.
  • Funding time for mentors to spend with early career teachers in the second year of induction, based upon 20 hours of mentoring across the academic year.

Schools can choose to work with one of six providers accredited by the Department for Education (including Ambition) who deliver a fully-funded training programme to early career teachers and their mentors.

Additional ‘mentor backfill payments’ are available to state schools opting into a provider-led programme, such as those offering the full induction programme. This extra funding will be paid to cover 36 hours per mentor over two years. The value of this funding is around £800-990 per mentor, per year, depending upon the region.

This provision aims to protect the time and space that early career teachers need to develop their teaching practice. It also recognises the importance of mentors by preserving the time they need for their crucial role in supporting this development.

"Another crucial part of mentoring under the ECF is leading new teachers through specific learning pathways and giving clear work-on points that help make tangible improvements to their practice."

3. Mentoring is different under the ECF framework.

Under the framework, the role of the mentor has been defined as being key to supporting the early career teacher and “is separate to the role of the induction tutor.” This “designated mentor” is expected to “provide, or broker, effective support, including phase or subject specific mentoring and coaching."

This puts quality mentoring at the heart of the ECF as a specific and protected part of the training provision. The role of the mentor is critical for many reasons, not least of which is how they adapt their own expertise to fit the early career teacher’s situation. Another crucial part of mentoring under the ECF is leading new teachers through specific learning pathways and giving clear work-on points that help make tangible improvements to their practice.

To do this, mentors need to reflect on their own practice and translate the evidence-based learning points into actionable insights within the early career teacher’s context. This takes time. The framework aims to ensure mentors receive 36 hours of training over two years. This is in recognition of how mentors are vital for developing teacher expertise.

4. Different providers do not offer different hours in which to complete the ECF.

All lead providers that run programmes for early career teachers must offer the same entitled support as defined by the framework, such as 39 hours of mentor meeting time.

The early career framework prescribes hours in this way in order to protect them, because they are necessary for early career teachers and mentors to develop their practice and complete the induction properly. The framework sets the expectation that that early career teachers have 10% off timetable in their first year of induction, and 5% off timetable in the second year of induction to undertake induction activities including training and mentoring.

While the framework is clear that early career teachers and mentors must be given this time, there is flexibility in how lead providers (like Ambition) can distribute it over the two years. However, if schools create their own programmes for their early career teachers, the Department for Education only requires them to demonstrate that they are covering the framework, without specifying hours in which to do that.

5. ECF does not mean more Ofsted inspections.

Ofsted is the body which inspects lead providers’ delivery of ECF training. This includes holding lead providers to account against consistent quality criteria. Ofsted visits a sample of delivery partners and engages others involved in receiving and delivering their programmes, including teachers and mentors.

However, while Ofsted inspectors visit a sample of delivery partners such as MATs and teaching school hubs, schools and delivery partners are not judged individually as part of these inspections, or directly named in reports. Schools which don't go with a provider are still subject to inspections via an appropriate body.


Find out more about the Early Career Framework here.

Ambition logo blue
Ambition Institute

Follow Ambition Institute

Search blog posts by topic: